from Groundswell

WRITE ON
Reprints of recently published Letters to the Editor and Extracts from Other Relevant Articles

Taxes Made Easier
by Sam Venturella, Chicago,IL
Chicago Tribune, June 18, 1999

The editorial "A better reassessment notice" (June 1) shows genuine progress in trying to inform taxpayers about real estate taxes. Critics who call those taxes confusing should follow Cook County Assessor James Houlihan's example. People can understand taxes on real estate when someone makes the effort to explain them.

Taxes on real estate are actually two different taxes: one on the land value; the other on the improvement value. The land-value tax tends to discourage the holding of land for speculation. The tax on improvements, though, makes home ownership more expensive. Shifting to a tax on land value only could make housing more affordable and without subsidies.

Tax Land Values, Not Buildings
by Dr. Tom Gihring, Seattle, WA
The Seattle Times, June 30, 1999

In a June 9 guest commentary, banker John Fairchild gave us his advice on how to purchase a house in Seattle's skyrocketing housing market ("How to purchase a house in Seattle's grim market").

His "clear solutions to the affordable-housing dilemma" offered education as the key to addressing the whole issue: "Do your homework, be smart, be realistic, be creative." Shrewd advice! But what does this have to do with solutions to the affordability problem?

The essence of the problem is that since the late 1970s, median housing prices have risen far faster than median household incomes. The principal cause is soaring land prices, which are driven up by speculation. A better example of creative public policy would be to tax land values more than building values.

Through simulation models, some economists have concluded that land and housing prices will fall in response to a land-value tax. My own conservative estimates show that by placing a heavy property tax on land and taking the tax off structures, Seattle-area home prices would come into line with incomes after about 12 years -- the time it takes for existing homes to turn over in the sales market.

Wouldn't everybody benefit, including the banking industry, by forestalling a burst in the inflationary bubble because of an over-heated real-estate market?



Back to the What's New page